Also the armor plates go nearly to the edges of the track. The IMPERIAL tank designs do not have road wheels or toothed drive wheels (these connect to a motor). Understand, this post is about a functional issue with GW vehicle designs for imperial tanks, not a cosmetic one. Take those characteristics into consideration and you can more easily attempt to portray a Leman Russ as modern or futuristic. Sponsons have been replaced with machine guns being mounted on top of the turret and secondary weapons being mounted coaxially (1 large cannon, 1 heavy machine gun, 2 light machine guns):Įven the bolt on the armor could be explained on a leman russ. There are instances of modern tanks with enclosed tracks: I think there are aspects of the leman russ that work others that don't. Obviously it doesn't work for what its suppose to be, a main battle tank. If you look at the Leman Russ as an over sized light tank or tankette its proportions make sense. I think one of the issues with the Leman Russ' aesthetic is that its proportions are too similarly based on smaller tanks. In general, what do you all see as flaws and issues with the leman russ battle tank model? A good number that deviate, but generally with pushing them more high tech. Some have even gone to the length of creating garage kits: With GW's very slight redo of the Leman Russ extra detail is being added and aspects are being reworked, but the vast majority is still the same. Many people have wanted to see a substantial redesign of the leman russ. I know its come up before in the past, but lets go. This is a continuation of a discussion that started page two of:
0 kommentar(er)
